Northeastern
Department of Social Work
Spring 2004
VALUES AND ETHICS, SOWK 4043
INSTRUCTOR
Dr. Dolores M. Poole,
Associate Professor
Office: BA C-157 Office: S.H 326
Telephone: 918-449-6537 Telephone: 918-456-5511, X3511
Fax: 918-449-6146 Fax: 918-452-2346
Office Hours: Mon:
Wed:
Thurs:
Fri:
And by appointment.
E-mail: poole@nsuok.edu
Web page: http://arapaho.nsuok.edu/~poole
COURSE TITLE
AND NUMBER
Values and Ethics, SOWK
4043
PREREQUISITES
None
COURSE DESCRIPTION
Special Topics
Designed to explore social
work and social welfare issues in greater depth, in a formal academic setting,
than is possible in other structured courses offered in social work. May be repeated with different topics to a maximum of nine
hours credit.
Core concepts needed to
investigate the wide range of ethical issues facing today’s social workers
are introduced. A comprehensive overview of the most
critical issues related to professional values, from ethical dilemmas and
decision making to the issues of professional misconduct are given. Both direct and indirect practice is illustrated by practice
vignettes. Clear guidelines for exploring and resolving
ethical issues of our time are presented.
COURSE PURPOSE
To integrate content about
values and principles of ethical decision making as presented in the National
Association of Social Workers Code of Ethics. The educational
experience provides students with the opportunity to be aware of personal
values; develop, demonstrate, and promote the values of the profession; and
analyze ethical dilemmas and the ways in which these affect practice, service,
and clients. Diversity elements will be emphasized
with special emphasis on Native Americans, Global issues, social justice,
and economic justice.
Upon successful completion
of this course, the student will demonstrate an ability to:
1. Apply
critical thinking skills within the context of professional social work ethical dilemmas and practice.
2. Understand
and demonstrate the value base of the profession and its ethical standards and principles, and practice
according to the NASW Code of Ethics.
3. Practice
without discrimination and with respect, knowledge, and skills related to
clients’ age, class, color, culture,
disability, ethnicity, family structure, gender, marital
status, national origin, race, religion, sex, and sexual orientation.
4. Apply
the knowledge and skills of generalist social work practice with systems
of all sizes.
5. Apply
professional research findings to ethical practice and interventions.
6. Use
communication skills differentially across client populations, colleagues,
and communities in relationship to ethical
practice.
7. Recognize
the need for cultural sensitivity in the provision of social group work practice with the inclusion of Native
American populations.
8. Recognize
the global context of the social work profession and the opportunities available to apply concepts of social group
work practice.
INSTRUCTIONAL
MATERIALS
Text
Corey, G., Corey, M.S.,
Callanan, P. (2003). Issues & ethics in the helping profession.
(6th ed.).
NASW. (1999). Code of ethics of the national association of social workers.
NASW. (1998).
Current controversies in social work ethics: Case examples.
Ancillary text
Linzer, N. (1999). Resolving ethical dilemmas in social work practice.
Thyer, B.A. (1997). Controversial issues in social work practice.
Wiesenthal, Simon. (1998).
The sunflower.
INSTRUCTIONAL PROCEDURES
The expected course outcomes
will be realized through a variety of instructional strategies to complement
students’ learning experiences. These strategies
include, but are not limited to, the following: expository-discussion, demonstration,
inquiry, oral reports, group activities. The instructor
will integrate appropriate multi-media technology and invite guest speakers,
for the purpose of enriching the students’ experience. Students
are expected to evidence the use of modern information and technology services.
Values and Ethics
Course Outline
Section 1208, SOWK 4043, Spring 2004
Class meets Thursdays,
Week I. Syllabus review and Texts
review
Jan.
15 A. Student awareness
of personal values and principles of ethical decision making.
B. Self-Assessment: An Inventory of your attitudes, beliefs and personal values about Professional and Ethical
Issues (Corey Ch. 1)
C. Group Presentation/Discussion
Social Workers’ Ethical Responsibilities to clients - NASW current
controversies in Social Work Ethics:
Case Examples 1-5.
D. Analyze ethical dilemmas and the ways in
which they affect practice services and clients. Handouts & discussion
on Ethical Principles, Ethical Theories, and Social
Work Practice. (Linzer 141)
E. Begin The
Sunflower by Simon Weisenthal – a Global
Perspective
Assignments: *Prepare
for Week 2.
Week II. Theory, Practice, Research,
and their affect on services and clients.
Jan. 22 A. Issues in Theory,
Practice, and Research.
B. Introduction (continued) to The Sunflower
by Simon Wiesenthal.
C. Social Workers’ Ethical Responsibilities
to clients. (NASW text 6-10)
Assignments: 1.
Write a response to question 10 Ch. 10 (Corey)
2. Use Info. Trac and write a response to
an additional reading; use their
key words for your search. Ch.
10 (Corey), two page response.
3. Write a paper about your beliefs and link
each belief to its root source or where and how you
came to a belief.
Week III. Social Workers as a Person and as a Professional.
Jan. 29 A. Students awareness
of personal values, Ch. 2 (Corey)
B. Current controversies in Social Work
Ethics: Case Ex. 11-15 with the Code of Ethics.
C. The Sunflower a story continued,
responses to the dilemma. Read and
discussed by students.
Assignments: 1.
Select an article from Info Trac College Edition Resources. Make the key word searches and
write a two page response to the article of your choice. Ch.2 (Corey).
Week
IV. Students’ awareness of personal values and the Helping Relationship.
Feb. 5
A. Ethics of imposing your values on clients,
Ch. 3 (Corey).
B. Current controversies in Social Work Ethics,
student presentation and discussion 16-20 (NASW).
C. The Sunflower class discussion
after ethical responses.
D. Value conflicts: To
Refer or Not.
Assignments: 1.
Corey
2. Write a two page response to a journal
article. Topics p.107, Ch.3 (Corey).
Week
V. Multicultural Perspective and Diversity Issues.
Feb. 12 A. Shared Traditional
American Indian Values (handout ed. Alvin Sallee)
B. Western and Eastern Values,
C. Value issues of Gay & Lesbian clients,
Ch. 5 (Corey)
D. The Sunflower – response and discussion
E. Current controversies in Social Work
Ethics, 21-25.
Assignments: 1.
Select a reading from the on-line library that relates to the key words for Ch. 4 (Corey) p. 145. Write
a two page response.
Week VI. Values and principles of ethical decision making.
Feb. 19 A. Clients Rights and
Counselor Responsibilities,
B. The Sunflower ethical response
and discussion.
C. Current controversies (NASW) 26-30.
D. Guest Speaker (attorney) and/or group
work.
Assignments: 1.
Complete Ch. 5 (Corey) Pre-Chapter self-inventory.
2. Complete responses to Involuntary Commitment
and Human Rights, p. 180.
3. Write a 2 page response to a journal reading,
4. Group 1: Suggested
Activity 1, p. 191
5. Group 2: Suggested
Activity 2, p. 191-2
6. Group 3: Suggested
Activity 3, p. 192
Week
VII. Confidentiality
Feb. 26 A. Ethical and Legal Issues,
B. Duty to Warn
C. Duty to Protect Potential Victims
D. The Sunflower
E. Current controversies 31-35 (NASW)
Assignments: 1.
Complete
2. Write a two-page response to a journal
reading; select topic of your choice, Ch. 6 (Corey)
p. 243.
3. Group 1: For and
Against Suicide Prevention.
4. Group 2: For and Against HIV – AIDS and
end of life issues.
Week
VIII. Managing
Boundaries and Multiple Relationships
Mar. 4
A. Dual and Multiple Relationships in
B. Bartering & Gifts
C. Sexual Relationships
D. The Sunflower (Wiesenthal)
E. Current Controversies 36-40 (NASW).
Assignments: 1.
Complete
2. Write a two-page response to a journal
reading; select topic of your
choice, Ch.
7 (Corey) p. 291.
3. Group 1: respond
to Activity 5 p. 289 (Corey).
4. Group 2: respond
to Activity 7, p. 289 (Corey).
Week IX. Issues in Supervision and Consultation
Mar. 11 A. The Supervisor’s Role
Ch. 9 (Corey).
B. Gender issues in supervision.
C. Sexual Intimacies during Professional
Training.
D. The Sunflower (Wiesenthal)
E. Current controversies, 41-45 (NASW).
Assignments: 1.
Complete
2. Write a two-page response to a journal
reading, select a topic of
your choice, Ch. 9 (Corey)
p. 353.
3. Group 1: Activity
4, p. 352.
Week X. Ethical Issues in Group Work
Mar. 25 A. Training and Supervision
of Group Leaders,
B. Confidentiality in Groups.
C. Termination.
D. The Sunflower (Wiesenthal)
E. Current Controversies 46-50 (NASW).
Assignments: 1.
Complete
2. Write a two-page response to a journal
reading, select a topic of
your choice, Ch. 12 (Corey) p. 443.
3. Group 1: Activity
4 p. 442.
4. Group 2: Activity
7 p. 443.
Week XI. Ethical Issues in Community Work
April 1 A. The Community Mental
Health Orientation,
B. Tasks of Community Counseling
C. Indigenous support and healing systems.
D. The Sunflower (Wiesenthal)
E. Current controversies p. 51-55 (NASW).
Assignments: 1.
Complete
2. Answer questions 1-11 p. 458 (Corey),
How you can be involved
in the community.
3. Write a two-page response to a journal
reading; select a topic of
your choice.
4. All students: Activity
4, p. 471-472.
Week XII. Ethical Issues in Couples and Family Therapy
April 8 A. Standards in
B. Contemporary Professional Issues
C. Confidentiality in Couples & Family
Therapy
D. The Sunflower (Weisenthal)
E. Current Controversies 56-60 (NASW).
Assignments: 1.
Complete
2. Write a two-page response to a journal
article, select a topic of
your choice, Ch. 11 (Corey) p. 418.
3. All students: Activity
4 p. 417.
Week XIII. – XVI. Video & Student Role Play, Action in Ethics
Begin Class Video for Final
Week
XIII. Current
Controversies (NASW) 61-65
April 15
Week
XIV. Current
Controversies (NASW) 66-70
April 22
Week XV. Current Controversies (NASW) 71-75
April 29
Week XVI. Current Controversies (NASW) 76-78
May 6
Final:
Video analysis paper on issues in relationship to Ethics. This begins to demonstrate your ability to develop, demonstrate,
and promote values of your profession. All students come with their paper and prepared to present
or ABSOLUTELY NO CREDIT.
ATTENDANCE
POLICY:
Notify the instructor
ASAP of any absences. Absences will affect the attendance
and participation grade. In addition, any student
who misses more than 25% of the classes will have their earned course grade
lowered one complete letter grade.
ASSIGNMENT
DUE DATES
Assignments
are due at the beginning of the class period on the date indicated when the
assignment is given. After the assignment due date,
work will be accepted up to one week late with a corresponding grade reduction
of one letter grade.
COURSE
EVALUATION
The course is
evaluated formally using the
MAKE-UP POLICY
If a student
knows they will miss class, arrangements must be made in advance to make-up
the missed work. In the event of personal illness
contact the instructor ASAP.
Any assignment
turned in late, without prior approval, will be marked late and will receive
a value reduction from the original total percentage up to one week from
the original due date. After that no papers will be
accepted.
ATTENDANCE
POLICY
Notify the instructor
ASAP of any absences. Absences will affect the attendance
and participation grade. In addition, any student
who misses more than 25% of the class will have their earned course grade
lowered one complete letter grade.
PLAGIARISM
AND CHEATING POLICY
Plagiarism is
the presentation of another’s work as you own. Plagiarism
or other forms of cheating will result in a grade of “Zero” for the exam
or assignment.
If any member
of the class feels that he/she has a disability and needs special accommodations
please advise the instructor of such disability at the first class attended. It is the responsibility of each student with a disability
to notify the university of such disability and to make a request for an
accommodation. Requests should be filed through the
Office of Student Affairs.
NON-DISCRIMINATION
POLICY
NSU is a community
of people with respect for diversity that emphasizes the dignity and equality
common to all individual faculty, staff, and students. This
institution does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, gender, age,
religion, ethnic or national origin, handicaps, status as a veteran, or political
or sexual orientation in any of its policies, practices or procedures. This includes, but is not limited to admissions, employment,
financial aid and educational services. In addition,
the university will not tolerate any behavior, verbal or physical conduct,
by any administrator, supervisor, faculty or staff member which constitutes
sexual harassment of a student. A committee, consisting
of faculty members and students, has been created to consider any complaints
by students concerning these regulations. An outline
of the grievance procedure is on file in the office of Personnel Services,
the office of the Dean of Student Affairs, and the Social Work Department
office.
INCLEMENT
WEATHER/DISASTER POLICY
The following
are basic premises for the inclement weather policy at
1. Classes are expected to
be held if at all possible.
2. It is the student’s responsibility
to receive information when weather is questionable.
3. Neither students nor faculty
are expected to risk life or limb.
4. Faculty members are obligated
to hold classes if the University is not closed,
unless the faculty member is unable to get to campus.
Policy: During
times of inclement weather, decisions concerning day classes will be made
by
The media will
be notified regarding closing of the campus. The automated
attendant message on 918-456-5511 will be modified to include information
concerning campus operations during inclement weather.
STUDENT EVALUATION
Grades will be
based upon completion of the following criteria. Each
percentage element must be complete and present for a passing grade. All assignments are to be typed or computer generated (no
written assignments accepted).
50% 1. For the Corey text assignment. The two-page written journal response for
chapters 10, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12, 13, 11 all must
be complete
20% 2. Student leadership for read presentations and class discussions
in Current Controversies
in Social Work Case Examples (NASW
98) using the (NASW 99) Code of Ethics in Response
to Ethical Dilemmas.
5% 3.
For All Corey text assigned chapters: 10, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 12,
13, 11.
Complete a written
response for the Pre-Chapter Self-Inventories and
significant chapter questions.
5% 4.
Student leadership for read presentations and
class discussions in The Sunflower (Wiesenthal).
5% 5.
Ethics in action. Video Role Play.
15% 6. Final Analysis Paper and Presentation
100% Total
CLASS GRADING
Grading is based on standard grading practices:100-90 = A; 89-80 = B; 79-70 = C;
69-60= D; 59 & below = F.
No extra credit assignments are available.
The final examination will be
administered
Students are advised that the
last date during the semester when they may drop a course with an automatic
“W” will be
Students wishing to visit with the professor about their standing in the class may visit during the posted office hours.
Bibliography
Abramson, M. & Black,
R. (1985). Extending the boundaries of life: Implications
for practice. Health and Social Work, 10, 165-173.
Abramson, J. & Mizrahi,
T. (1996). When social workers and physicians collaborate: Positive and negative interdisciplinary
experiences. Social Work, 41, 3,
270-281.
Abramson, J. & Mizrahi,
T. (1986). Strategies for enhancing collaboration
between social workers and physicians. Social Work in Health Care, 12, 1, 1-21.
American Association of
Marital and Family Therapy (2001). Code
of ethics.
Anastas, J. (1999). Research design for social work and human services.
Beauchamp, T. & Childress,
J. (1994). Principles of biomedical ethics,
Black, P., Congress, E.,
& Strom-Gottfried, K. (in press). Teaching
social work values and ethics: A curriculum resource.
Brown, A., Carpenter,
C., Cooledge, C., Drover, G., Ericksen, J., Fielding, D., Hill, D., Johnston, J., Segal, S., Silver, J. &
Sweeney, V. (1995). Bridging the professions: An integrated and interdisciplinary
approach to teaching health care ethics. Academic Medicine, 70, 11, 1002-1005.
Congress, E. (1986). An analysis of ethical practice among field
instructors in social work education.
Congress, E. (1996). Dual relationships in academia: Dilemmas
for social work educators. Journal of Social Work Education, 32(3), 329-338.
Congress, E. (1999). Social work
ethics for the 21st century: Identifying and resolving ethical dilemmas.
Congress E. (2001). Dual relationships in social work education:
Report on a national survey. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(2): 255-266.
Council on Social Work
Education (1994). Curriculum Policy
Statement.
Council on Social Work
Education (1997). Annual Request for
Statistical Information.
Csikai, E. (1997). Social workers’ participation on hospital ethics committees: An assessment of involvement and
satisfaction. Arete, 22, 1, 1-13.
Csikai, E. & Sales,
E. (1998). The emerging social work role on hospital
ethics committees: A comparison
of social worker and chair perspectives. Social Work, 43, 3, 233-242.
Dodd, S. (2000). An empirical study of the role of social workers in ethical
decision making in the hospital setting (Doctoral dissertation,
University of Southern
Drisko, J. (1997). Strengthening qualitative studies and reports: Standards to promote academic integrity. Journal of Social Work Education, 33(1),
185-197.
Fox, E., Arnold, R., L&
Brody, B. (19959). Medical ethics education: Past, present, and future. Academic Medicine, 70, 9, 761-769.
Gelman, S., & Gibelman,
M. (1999). A quest for citations?
An analysis of and commentary on the trend toward
multiple authorship. Journal of Social
Work Education, 35(2): 203-213.
Gibelman, M., & Gelman,
S. (1999). Who’s the author? Ethical
issues in publishing. Arete, 23(1), 77-88.
Gibelman, M., & Gelman,
S. (2001). Learning from the mistakes of others:
A look at scientific misconduct in research. Journal of Social Work Education, 37(2):
241- 254.
Gilligan, C. (1981). In a different voice.
Gillon, R. (1987). Medical ethics education. Journal of Medical Ethics, 13, 115-116.
Goldstein, L. (2000). Ethical dilemmas in designing collaborative research: Lessons learned the hard way. Qualitative Studies in Education 13(5),
517-530.
Hart, N., & Crawford-Wright,
A. (1999). Research as therapy, therapy as research: Ethical dilemmas in new-paradigm research. British Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 27(2), 205-214.
Hamilton, J., Grego, A.,
& Tanner J. (1997). Ethical questions regarding
joint authorship: business and non-business faculty
perceptions on noncontributing authorship. Journal of Education for Business, 72(6), 325-330.
Hawkins, J., Veeder, N.,
& Pearce, C. (1998). Nurse-social worker
collaboration in managed care: A model of community
case management.
Jansson, B. (1999). Becoming an effective policy advocate:
From policy practice to social justice.
Jansson, B. & Dodd,
S. (In Press). Ethical activism: Strategies
for empowering medical social workers. Social Work in Health Care. (Accepted
Feb. 2001).
Jayaratne, S., Croxton,
T., & Mattison, D. (1997). Social work professional
standards: An exploratory study. Social
Work, 42(2), 187-199.
Joseph, V. & Conrad,
A. (1989). Social work influence on interdisciplinary
ethical decision making in health care. Health and Social Work, 14, 1, 22-30.
Kitchener, K. (1992). Psychologist as teacher and mentor: Affirming ethical values
throughout the curriculum. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 23,190-195.
Kugelman, W. (1992). Social work ethics in the practice arena: A qualitative study. Social Work in Health Care, 17, 4, 59-80.
Linzer, N. (1999). Resolving ethical dilemmas in social work practice.
Lowenberg, F., & Dolgoff,
R., & Harrington, D. (2000). Ethical
decisions for social work practice (6th
edition). Peacock:
Mattison, M. (2000). Ethical decision making: The person
in the process. Social Work, 45, 3, 201-212.
Mizrahi, T. & Abramson,
J. (1985). Sources of strain between physicians
and social workers: Implications for social workers
in health care settings. Social Work in
Health Care, 10, 3, 33-51.
NASW (1999). Code of Ethics.
Netting, F., & Nichols-Casebolt,
A. (1997). Authorship and collaboration: Preparing the next generation of
social work scholars. Journal of Social
Work Education, 33(2), 555-564.
Osman, H. & Perlin,
T. (1994). Patient self-determination and the artificial
prolongation of life. Health and Social Work, 19, 4, 245-252.
Proctor, E., Morrow-Howell,
& Lott, C. (1993). Classification and correlates
of ethical dilemmas in hospital social work. Social Work, 38, 2, 166-176.
Reamer, F. (2001). Ethics education in social work. CSWE:
Reamer, F. (1999). Social work values and ethics (2nd
edition).
Reamer, F. (1998). Ethical standards in social work: A critical
review of the NASW Code of Ethics.
Rippley-Massat, C., &
Lundy, M.(1997). Empowering research participants. Affilia, 34(2), 33-56.
Roberts, C. (1989). Conflicting professional values in social work and medicine. Health & Social Work,
14, 3, 211-218.
Rosenthal, E. (1993). How doctors learn to think they are doctors. New York Times, November
28, p. 1, 4.
Royse, D. (1999). Research methods in social work. (3rd
ed.).
Rubin, A., & Babbie,
E. (1997). Research methods in social
work. (3rd ed.).
Silverman, E. (1992). Hospital Bioethics: A beginning knowledge base for the
neonatal social worker. Social Work, 37, 2, 150-154.
Smith, K. (1996). Ethical decision-making by staff nurses. Nursing Ethics, 3, 1, 17-25.
Strom-Gottfried, K. (1999). Professional boundaries: An analysis of violations by social workers. Families in
Society, 90(5), 439-449.
Thyer, B.A. (1997). Controversial issues in social work practice.
Walden, T., Wolock,