ENGL 4203/5583:
Shakespeare: Histories and Comedies
John M. Mercer,
Professor of English
Northeastern State University,
Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
Study Guide 5: Richard II
Please note: Because
of the frequent use of boldface in this study guide, please highlight your
answers or insert them in color; do NOT put
them in boldface.
Shakespeare’s History Plays
- The
first collected edition of Shakespeare’s plays, known as the First Folio, was published in
1623, seven years after Shakespeare’s death. Into what three genres does the table of
contents of the First Folio (reproduced on page 101 of The Riverside Shakespeare, 2nd
ed.) classify Shakespeare’s plays?
Alternative names
for this genre: Histories are also known
as history plays, chronicle history plays, and English history plays.
Content of
history plays: Histories are based on English
history in the four centuries prior to their composition.
- What
plays by Shakespeare portray historical events but are not classified as
history plays (again, see page 101) because they do not concern English
history of recent centuries? How
are these plays classified in the table of contents of the First Folio?
Sources of
history plays: Histories are based on 16th-century history books
called chronicles or chronicle histories. These books are not objective by today’s
historical standards but rather reflect an ideology known as the Tudor myth (see discussion below).
Impetus for creation
of this genre: The patriotic fervor
following the English defeat of the Spanish
Armada in 1588 inspired the composition and performance of about 200 history
plays from 1588 to 1603.
Place of
Shakespeare’s history plays among other plays of this genre: Most of the
history plays written by Shakespeare’s contemporaries have been lost or are rarely
read today. An exception is Christopher
Marlowe’s Edward II, which is still
well known and has been made into a film. (Extra-credit
viewing: Watch and respond to the film of Edward II.)
Characteristics
of history plays:
·
History plays usually have loose, episodic plots that are unified primarily by their presentation
of significant events from the reign of one monarch after whom the play is
titled.
·
History plays drastically condense the events of many years into two- or
three-hour productions.
·
History plays integrate scenes created by the
imagination of the playwright (fiction) with scenes described in the chronicle
history books (nonfiction that reflects the bias of the writers).
·
History plays reflect the political ideology of the chronicle history books
as well as the personal bias of the
playwright.
·
History plays have large casts of characters—often much larger than the casts of Shakespeare’s
tragedies or comedies—and little depth of characterization for most of the
characters.
·
History plays rely on the spectacle of portraying great battles and public ceremonies.
·
History plays may combine elements of tragedy
and comedy or exhibit the traits of just one of these genres. In addition to
being history plays, Shakespeare’s Richard
II and Richard III are tragedies,
and Henry IV, Part I, and Henry V are comedies.
- According
to the table of contents of the First Folio (page 101), how many history
plays did Shakespeare write?
All but two of Shakespeare’s history plays belong to two tetralogies, each containing four
plays. (Just as a trilogy is a series of
three related works, a tetralogy is
a series of four related works.) Shakespeare’s first tetralogy, written in 1590-91, covers events of 1422-85. Learn in order the titles of the first tetralogy
of Shakespeare’s history plays:
- Henry VI, Part I (1H6)
- Henry VI, Part II (2H6)
- Henry VI, Part II (3H6)
- Richard III (R3)
Shakespeare’s second
tetralogy, written in 1595-99, covers events of 1398-1420. Learn in order the titles of the second tetralogy
of Shakespeare’s history plays:
- Richard II (R2)
- Henry IV, Part I (1H4)
- Henry IV, Part II (2H4)
- Henry V (H5)
Since the events of the second tetralogy occurred before the
events of the first tetralogy, we are studying the second tetralogy first. We will read all the plays of the second
tetralogy except Henry IV, Part II.
- Which
two of Shakespeare’s history plays are not part of a tetralogy?
- When
did Shakespeare write Richard II?
The Tudor Myth
Purpose of the
Tudor myth: Henry Tudor became King Henry
VII in 1485 after he defeated Richard III in the Battle of Bosworth Field at
the end of the Wars of the Roses.
Because Henry VII’s claim to the throne was weak, he needed to justify
his kingship.
Seminal text of
the Tudor myth: King Henry VII commissioned Polydore Vergil’s Anglica Historia (English History), which covers English political history from 1399
to 1485. This book, which greatly
influenced subsequent Tudor historians, attempted to legitimize Henry VII’s
right to the throne.
Philosophy behind
the Tudor myth: The Tudor myth assumes that
the events of history are guided by God (divine Providence) and that history reveals moral
truths by which kings and their subjects should be governed.
Sources for Richard II: All of Shakespeare’s sources for Richard II are based on the Tudor
myth. His two most important sources are
Raphael Holinshed’s Chronicles, a
prose history, and Samuel Daniels’s First
Four Books of the Civil Wars, a narrative poem.
Degree of
Shakespeare’s adherence to the Tudor myth in Richard II: Although Shakespeare’s sources reflect
the Tudor myth, Shakespeare’s history plays, including Richard II, are more complex:
In some ways they adhere to the ideology of the Tudor myth, and in other
ways they deviate from it.
- In
the Tudor myth, the deposition of Richard II in 1399 is seen as the
“original sin” that eventually leads to the Wars of the Roses in the 15th
century. In Richard II, for example, the Bishop of Carlisle warns
Bullingbrook that it would be a terrible crime for him to remove Richard
from the throne (4.1.114-49). What prediction does Carlisle
make? How are his words consistent
with the Tudor myth?
- In
the Tudor myth, Richard II is a rightful king, and Bullingbrook is a
usurper. Therefore, one would
expect to see Shakespeare depict Richard in a positive light and
Bullingbrook in a negative light.
Is this the case in the play?
- In
what ways is Richard depicted positively?
In what ways is Richard depicted negatively? In his negative depiction of Richard,
Shakespeare relies not on the Tudor myth but on another myth or tradition
about Richard—that he was a frivolous king ruined by flatterers. What evidence of this myth do you find
in the play?
- In
what ways is Bullingbrook depicted positively? In what ways is Bullingbrook depicted
negatively?
- In
the first half of the play, which character, in your opinion, does the
play present more sympathetically?
Support your answer. How
does this portrayal relate to the Tudor myth?
- In
the last half of the play, which character, in your opinion, does the
play present more sympathetically?
Support your answer. How
does this portrayal relate to the Tudor myth?
- In
the play as a whole, does the play, in your opinion, present one of the
two main characters more sympathetically than the other? If so, which one? Support your answer. How does this portrayal relate to the
Tudor myth?
Medieval Setting of the Play
Middle Ages (Medieval Period) in England: 449-1485
Events of Richard II:
1398-1400
Renaissance (Early Modern Period) in England:
1485-1660
Composition of Richard
II: 1595
- During
what period is Richard II
set? During what period was the
play written and first performed?
- In
medieval England,
the king served as the ultimate judge.
In what scenes of Richard II
does the king serve as judge?
- In
medieval England,
kings did NOT claim to rule by “divine right.” In Renaissance England,
however, the Tudor monarchs claimed to rule by divine right. Extra-credit
research or prior knowledge: What is meant by the divine right of
kings?
- In Richard II, does Richard claim to
rule by divine right? What relevant
information do you find in each of the following passages? What other passages address this issue?
- Richard’s
speech in 3.2.36-62
- Richard’s
speech during the deposition scene in 4.1.201-22
- The
action in Richard II is said to
be more formal and ceremonial than in any other Shakespearean play. The play includes several ceremonies
that were especially important in medieval England. Where in the play is each of the
following ceremonies enacted? What
formalities are involved in each of the following ceremonies?
- Challenge
of an opponent
- Trial
by combat
- Deposition
of a ruler
- In
this ceremonial play, Richard and Bullingbrook never have a violent clash
and hardly have a verbal clash. In
what scenes between the two characters does formal ceremony take the place
of real action? How?
- In
what scenes does Richard even grieve in a ceremonial way? What is formal and ceremonial about his
grieving?
Richard and Bullingbrook as Character Foils
- How
do John of Gaunt’s words to Bullingbrook in 1.3.265-67 explain the concept
of a foil? (See the footnote for
line 266.)
- The
two main characters are foils
in that they exhibit many contrasts that help us better understand both
characters.
- Which
character is practical and realistic, like a politician? Which character is artistic and
idealistic, like an actor, poet, or orator?
- Which
character is active and decisive?
Which character is passive, contemplative, and imaginative?
- Which
character is a man of few words?
Which character never seems to stop talking about himself?
- Which
character is known for efficiency and has excellent public
relations? Which character is
known for misgovernment and has a bad reputation with the people?
- Which
character is associated with steel, a newer, more efficient metal? Which character is associated with
gold, an ancient precious metal with few practical uses? To answer these
two questions, see, for example, 3.2.59.
What other passages in the play associate one character with steel
and the other with gold?
- Which
character has the cold calculation of Octavius Caesar in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar and Antony and Cleopatra? Which character has been called a dry
run for (or early version of) Hamlet?
Richard
- How
does Richard respond to the illness (1.4.59-64) and death (2.1.153-62) of
his uncle John of Gaunt? What do
Richard’s responses reveal about his character?
- What
specific policies and actions cause Richard to lose the support of the
people? What are “blank charters” (1.4.48)?
- In
the trial by combat scene at Coventry
(1.3), what particularly capricious action does Richard take? Why does he take this action? Why does he take this action only after
all the ceremonies have been performed?
- Richard
reveals his egotism in many ways.
- What
shows that Richard is especially susceptible to flatterers? How does his relationship with
flatterers relate to his egotism?
- Like
Jesus, Richard dies at age 33.
Where in the play does Richard compare himself to Jesus? How does Richard think he is like
Jesus?
- In
3.2, what bad news does Richard receive?
How does Richard respond to this news? How does his response reveal excessive
self-involvement and self-pity?
How does his response also reveal his unwillingness to take
decisive action?
- In
5.1, when Richard parts from his wife for what he knows will be the last
time, what does he ask her to do when she goes to France? How does this request reveal his
egotism?
- How
does York describe the scene (not depicted
on stage) in which Richard is marched into London as the prisoner of Bullingbrook
(5.2.1-41)? How does this account
create sympathy for Richard?
- How
does Richard behave during his murder scene (5.5.105-19)? How does this scene affect the
audience’s sympathy for the character?
Bullingbrook
- According
to Richard in 1.4.20-36, how does Bullingbrook act in public when he is on
his way to exile? What do these
actions reveal about Bullingbrook’s character?
- What
are Bullingbrook’s intentions when he returns from exile? Does he come back to England
only to claim his rightful inheritance, or does he intend to seize the
throne from Richard? Is he a
strong, silent, decent politician, or is he a hypocritical schemer? Why is it difficult to determine his
intentions?
- What
problem does Bullingbrook have with his son Prince Hal? (This problem is central to the plot of
the next play in this tetralogy, 1
Henry IV.)
- When
and why does Bullingbrook (now King Henry IV) express feelings of
guilt? How does he want to expiate
his guilt?
Plot
The plot of Richard II
concerns the fall of Richard and the rise of Bullingbrook.
- What
actions of Richard’s serve as a turning point in his fortunes, giving
Bullingbrook a pretext to return to England and rendering Richard
too weak to resist being overthrown?
- On
what occasion does Salisbury
compare Richard to a “shooting star” that falls to the earth (2.3.18-20)?
- At Flint Castle, why does Richard compare
himself to “glist’ring Phaëton” (3.3.178)? In this scene in the BBC video of this
play, Richard slowly descends a long circular staircase in order to meet
Bullingbrook. How is this visual
imagery in the video appropriate to the play?
- In
the deposition scene, to what does Richard compare his descent and
Bullingbrook’s ascent (4.1.184-89)?
How is this simile appropriate to the situation?
- How
is the audience’s sympathy for each of the two main characters inversely
related to the character’s power?
- When
does Richard have the most power and get the least sympathy from the
audience? When does Richard have
the least power and get the most sympathy?
- When
does Bullingbrook have the least power and get the most sympathy from the
audience? When does Bullingbrook
have the most power and get the least sympathy?
Images of Richard’s Misgovernment
Various image patterns throughout the play emphasize
Richard’s misgovernment of England. As you read the play, mark every instance
you find of each of the following image patterns, and record as many as you
can in your study guide.
1. England
under Richard is compared to an untended garden overrun with caterpillars.
a. Bullingbrook
refers to Bushy, Bagot, and other flatterers of Richard as “caterpillars of the
commonwealth” (2.3.165-66). How or why
is this comparison appropriate? How are
the names Bushy, Bagot, and Green symbolic of an untended garden?
b. What
comparison do the gardener and his assistants draw between England and the
garden they are tending (3.4)? In what
sense do they say their own work is futile?
c. What
other passages develop this image of England as an untended garden?
2. England
under Richard is compared to land that has been leased.
a. How
does John of Gaunt develop this metaphor in 2.1.57-70?
b. How
does John of Gaunt develop this metaphor in 2.1.110?
c. What
other passages develop this image?
3. The
crisis to which Richard has brought the country is marked by disruptions of
nature.
a. What
disruptions in nature do Salisbury
and the Welsh Captain note (2.4)?
b. Are
other disruptions in nature noted in the play?
Famous Lines and Speeches
- Mowbray’s
farewell to the English language (1.3.159-73)
- John
of Gaunt’s “this England”
speech (2.1.40-68), including these lines:
This royal throne of kings, this
sceptred isle,
This earth of majesty, this seat
of Mars,
This other Eden, demi-paradise,
. . . . . . . . . .
This blessed plot, this earth,
this realm, this England
- Richard’s
speech of self-pity upon learning that he has no support, beginning with
the lines, “For God’s sake let us sit upon the ground / And tell sad
stories of the death of kings . . .” (3.2.155-56)
- Richard’s
parting words to his wife, including “Tell thou the lamentable tale of me,
/ And send the hearers weeping to their beds” (5.1.44-45)
- Richard’s
final soliloquy, including the line “I wasted time, and now doth time
waste me” (5.5.19)