Dr.
Amy Aldridge SanfordÕs Student Teaching Evaluations
Spring
2009-Fall 2011 Mean Scores
(on
a 5-point scale)
|
|
FA11 Qual Research **Blended** (N=4) |
FA11 WomenÕs Movements (N=11) |
SP11 Interview (N=9) |
SP11 Nonprofit (N=12) |
FA10 Qual Research (N=6) |
FA10 Teaching Strategies (N=5) |
SP10 Group Dynamics (N=20) |
SP10 Public Speak (N=11) |
SP10 Interview (N=9) |
SP10 Advance Group (N=10) |
FA09 Qual Research (N=7) |
FA09 Teaching Strategies (N=10) |
SP09 Nonprofit (N=12) |
|
1. I
learned a great deal in this class. |
5.00 |
4.91 |
5.00 |
4.92 |
5.00 |
4.80 |
4.50 |
4.82 |
4.56 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
4.90 |
4.42 |
|
2. I
worked hard in this class. |
5.00 |
5.00 |
4.44 |
5.00 |
4.83 |
4.80 |
4.45 |
4.73 |
4.56 |
5.00 |
4.86 |
4.80 |
4.42 |
|
3. The
syllabus was an accurate guide to the essential elements of this course. |
5.00 |
4.91 |
4.33 |
4.92 |
5.00 |
4.80 |
4.63 |
4.73 |
4.67 |
4.90 |
4.86 |
4.70 |
4.83 |
|
4. The
course objectives were clearly presented. |
5.00 |
4.91 |
4.22 |
4.83 |
5.00 |
4.60 |
4.65 |
4.82 |
4.78 |
5.00 |
4.71 |
5.00 |
4.92 |
|
5. The
instructor had high expectations of student learning. |
5.00 |
4.91 |
4.56 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
4.80 |
4.8 |
4.82 |
4.78 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
4.92 |
|
6.
Course concepts were presented in a way that helped me to learn. |
4.50 |
4.64 |
4.44 |
4.67 |
4.83 |
4.60 |
4.75 |
4.82 |
4.56 |
4.80 |
4.86 |
4.90 |
4.58 |
|
7.
This course was well organized. |
4.75 |
4.82 |
4.67 |
4.83 |
5.00 |
4.80 |
4.75 |
4.73 |
4.67 |
4.90 |
4.86 |
5.00 |
4.83 |
|
8. My
work was evaluated in ways helpful to my learning. |
4.50 |
4.64 |
4.44 |
4.83 |
5.00 |
4.80 |
4.65 |
4.73 |
4.67 |
5.00 |
4.71 |
4.90 |
4.75 |
|
9.
Class lectures and assignments made the instructorÕs expectations attainable. |
4.25 |
4.73 |
4.44 |
4.58 |
4.67 |
4.60 |
4.65 |
4.82 |
4.67 |
4.90 |
4.71 |
4.80 |
4.67 |
|
10.
Students were encouraged to see the instructor for additional assistance. |
4.75 |
4.73 |
4.67 |
4.73 |
5.00 |
4.80 |
4.65 |
4.82 |
4.56 |
4.90 |
4.86 |
4.80 |
4.58 |
|
11.
The instructor treated each student fairly and with respect. |
4.75 |
5.00 |
4.67 |
4.67 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
4.80 |
4.82 |
4.78 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
4.75 |
|
12.
The instructor seemed genuinely concerned with helping students. |
4.75 |
4.91 |
4.78 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
4.75 |
4.82 |
4.78 |
4.60 |
4.86 |
5.00 |
4.83 |
|
13.
The instructor encouraged students to participate in class. |
4.75 |
5.00 |
4.78 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
4.80 |
4.91 |
4.78 |
4.60 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
4.83 |
|
14.
The instructor was easy to understand. |
4.75 |
4.91 |
4.56 |
4.83 |
5.00 |
4.80 |
4.80 |
4.82 |
4.67 |
4.80 |
4.71 |
5.00 |
4.67 |
|
15.
The instructor motivated me to do my best work in this class. |
5.00 |
4.91 |
4.56 |
4.83 |
4.83 |
4.80 |
4.75 |
4.82 |
4.78 |
4.80 |
5.00 |
4.8 |
4.67 |
|
16.
The instructor challenged my thinking. |
5.00 |
5.00 |
4.67 |
4.92 |
5.00 |
4.60 |
4.74 |
4.73 |
4.89 |
4.70 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
4.83 |
|
17.
The instructor maintained an atmosphere conducive to learning. |
5.00 |
4.82 |
4.44 |
4.75 |
5.00 |
4.80 |
4.70 |
4.82 |
4.78 |
4.70 |
4.71 |
5.00 |
4.67 |
|
18.
The instructor helped me see relationships among important topics and ideas. |
4.50 |
4.91 |
4.67 |
4.75 |
5.00 |
4.60 |
4.75 |
4.73 |
4.78 |
4.70 |
4.71 |
4.80 |
4.67 |
|
19. I
would recommend this instructor to other students. |
4.75 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
4.92 |
5.00 |
4.80 |
4.80 |
4.91 |
4.89 |
4.70 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
4.75 |
|
20.
Overall, this instructor was an effective teacher. |
4.75 |
5.00 |
4.89 |
5.00 |
5.00 |
4.80 |
4.80 |
4.73 |
4.89 |
4.70 |
4.86 |
5.00 |
4.92 |