Group Work Peer Evaluation Form
With thanks to Dr. Ted Legantski
Your name___Mickey
Mouse__________________________________________________
Group Number_2______
Project Title___Retired Airline
Pilots Association______________________________
Please evaluate other members in your
group on each of the following four criteria on a scale of 0- 25. Do not
include yourself.
| Time commitment | Cooperation with others | Share of workload | Quality of work | Total | |
| Name, Student 1
Donald Duck |
25 | 12 | 25 | 25 | 87 |
| Name, Student 2
Minnie Mouse |
25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 100 |
| Name, Student 3
Bugs Bunny |
2 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 14 |
| Name, Student 4 | |||||
| Name, Student 5 | |||||
| Name, Student 6 |
Your name_______Minnie Mouse________________________________________________
Group Number__2_____
Project Title______Retired Airline
Pilots Association___________________________
Please evaluate other members in your
group on each of the following four criteria on a scale of 0- 25. Do not
include yourself.
| Time commitment | Cooperation with others | Share of workload | Quality of work | Total | |
| Name, Student 1 Donald Duck | 25 | 0 | 25 | 25 | 75 |
| Name, Student 2
Mickey Mouse |
23 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 100 |
| Name, Student 3
Bugs Bunny |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Name, Student 4 | |||||
| Name, Student 5 | |||||
| Name, Student 6 |
Group Work Peer Evaluation Form
With thanks to Dr. Ted Legantski
Your name____Bugs
Bunny___________________________________________________
Group Number__2_____
Project Title_________Retired
Airline Pilots Association________________________
Please evaluate other members in your
group on each of the following four criteria on a scale of 0- 25. Do not
include yourself.
| Time commitment | Cooperation with others | Share of workload | Quality of work | Total | |
| Name, Student 1
Donald Duck |
15 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 45 |
| Name, Student 2
Mickey Mouse |
25 | 25 | 25 | 12 | 87 |
| Name, Student 3
Minnie Mouse |
25 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 100 |
| Name, Student 4 | |||||
| Name, Student 5 | |||||
| Name, Student 6 |
Group Work Peer Evaluation Form
With thanks to Dr. Ted Legantski
Your name_________Donald
Duck______________________________________________
Group Number__2_____
Project Title_____Retired Airline
Pilots Association____________________________
Please evaluate other members in your
group on each of the following four criteria on a scale of 0- 25. Do not
include yourself.
| Time commitment | Cooperation with others | Share of workload | Quality of work | Total | |
| Name, Student 1
Mickey Mouse |
12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 48 |
| Name, Student 2
Minnie Mouse |
12 | 12 | 12 | 12 | 48 |
| Name, Student 3
Bugs Bunny |
2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| Name, Student 4
|
|||||
| Name, Student 5
|
|||||
| Name, Student 6
|
Each student's score will be divided by the highest score within the team to determine the percentage peer evaluation score. That percentage will then become the factor to determine your grade. As a result, if the overall group receives, say, 175 points on a 200-point project, and you receive an 86% peer evaluation, your credit for the group work will be 86% of 175 points, or 151 points. Individual evaluations, such as that conducted on your speaking in a presentation will not be subject to peer evaluation.
Upon receipt of peer evaluations, I will total them
like this:
| Student | Evaluated by Donald Duck | Evaluated by Mickey Mouse | Evaluated by Bugs Bunny | Evaluated by Minnie Mouse | Grand
Total |
| Donald Duck | 87 | 45 | 75 | 207 | |
| Mickey Mouse | 48 | 87 | 100 | 235 | |
| Bugs Bunny | 8 | 14 | 0 | 22 | |
| Minnie Mouse | 48 | 100 | 100 | 248 |
Minnie Mouse has the highest score, 248, as a result, everyone will be evaluated on a factor based upon their score divided by her score:
Minnie Mouse: 248
= 1
248
Mickey Mouse: 235
= .94758 (rounded to .95)
248
Donald Duck: 207
= .834677 (rounded to .84)
248
Bugs Bunny 22 =
.0887096 (rounded to .09)
248
Applying the factors and my analysis of the project, each member will receive an evaluation that will look something like this:
| Student: Mickey Mouse
Principles of Meeting Management Project Group 2 Retired Airlines Pilots Association Meeting |
Actual points | Possible Points | Notes |
| Written Report Summary | 135 | 150 | |
| Oral Report Summary | 48 | 50 | |
| Early Bonus | |||
| Total points | 183 | 200 | |
| Peer evaluation factor | .95 | ||
| Final score (total points times peer evaluation) | 174 | 200 | |
| Written Report | |||
| Introduction, setting, organization of paper. | 30 | 40 | |
| Quality of analysis and integration of theory and material learned. | 48 | 50 | |
| Quality of conclusions. | 38 | 40 | |
| Grammar, spelling language totals (based on following): | 19 | 20 | |
| Minor grammatical errors (no penalty) | 2 | ||
| Grammatical errors (minus .333 points) | 2 | ||
| Spelling errors (minus .333 points) | 1 | ||
| Typographical, style errors (minus .333 points) | 0 | ||
| Time limits [9.32] | 8.333 | 8.333 | |
| Appearance | 8.333 | 8.333 | |
| Speaking | 7.75 | 8.333 | |
| Use of visual aids, overall presentation | 23.25 | 25 | |
| Student: Minnie Mouse
Principles of Meeting Management Project Group 2 Retired Airlines Pilots Association Meeting |
Actual points | Possible Points | Notes |
| Written Report Summary | 135 | 150 | |
| Oral Report Summary | 46 | 50 | |
| Early Bonus | |||
| Total points | 181 | 200 | |
| Peer evaluation factor | 1 | ||
| Final score (total points times peer evaluation) | 181 | 200 | |
| Written Report | |||
| Introduction, setting, organization of paper. | 30 | 40 | |
| Quality of analysis and integration of theory and material learned. | 48 | 50 | |
| Quality of conclusions. | 38 | 40 | |
| Grammar, spelling language totals (based on following): | 19 | 20 | |
| Minor grammatical errors (no penalty) | 2 | ||
| Grammatical errors (minus .333 points) | 2 | ||
| Spelling errors (minus .333 points) | 1 | ||
| Typographical, style errors (minus .333 points) | 0 | ||
| Presentation | |||
| Time limits | 8.333 | 8.333 | |
| Appearance | 8.333 | 8.333 | |
| Speaking | 6 | 8.333 | |
| Use of visual aids, overall presentation | 23.25 | 25 | |
| Student: Donald Duck
Principles of Meeting Management Project Group 2 Retired Airlines Pilots Association Meeting |
Actual points | Possible Points | Notes |
| Written Report Summary | 135 | 150 | |
| Oral Report Summary | 44 | 50 | |
| Early Bonus | |||
| Total points | 179 | 200 | |
| Peer evaluation factor | .84 | ||
| Final score (total points times peer evaluation) | 150 | 200 | |
| Written Report | |||
| Introduction, setting, organization of paper. | 30 | 40 | |
| Quality of analysis and integration of theory and material learned. | 48 | 50 | |
| Quality of conclusions. | 38 | 40 | |
| Grammar, spelling language totals (based on following): | 19 | 20 | |
| Minor grammatical errors (no penalty) | 2 | ||
| Grammatical errors (minus .333 points) | 2 | ||
| Spelling errors (minus .333 points) | 1 | ||
| Typographical, style errors (minus .333 points) | 0 | ||
| Presentation | |||
| Time limits | 8.333 | 8.333 | |
| Appearance | 6 | 8.333 | |
| Speaking | 6.5 | 8.333 | |
| Use of visual aids, overall presentation | 23.25 | 25 | |
| Student:
Bugs Bunny
Principles of Meeting Management Project Group 2 Retired Airlines Pilots Association Meeting |
Actual points | Possible Points | Notes |
| Written Report Summary | 135 | 150 | |
| Oral Report Summary | 48 | 50 | |
| Early Bonus | |||
| Total points | 183 | 200 | |
| Peer evaluation factor | .09 | ||
| Final score (total points times peer evaluation) | 17 | 200 | |
| Written Report | |||
| Introduction, setting, organization of paper. | 30 | 40 | |
| Quality of analysis and integration of theory and material learned. | 48 | 50 | |
| Quality of conclusions. | 38 | 40 | |
| Grammar, spelling language totals (based on following): | 19 | 20 | |
| Minor grammatical errors (no penalty) | 2 | ||
| Grammatical errors (minus .333 points) | 2 | ||
| Spelling errors (minus .333 points) | 1 | ||
| Typographical, style errors (minus .333 points) | 0 | ||
| Presentation | |||
| Time limits | 8.333 | 8.333 | |
| Appearance | 8.333 | 8.333 | |
| Speaking | 8.333 | 8.333 | |
| Use of visual aids, overall presentation | 23.25 | 25 | |