1. The meeting was called to order at 3:10 p.m. by President Wickham in the NET Tower Room.
Council Members in attendance: Terri Baker (Liberal Arts), Gary Cheatham (Library), John Diamantopoulos (Science & Health Professions), Dan Glasgow (Education), Peggy Kaney (Library), Andre Marquis (Liberal Arts & Education), Rick Matzen (Science & Health Professions), Jeff Miller (Optometry), Latricia Pack (Optometry), David Scott (Liberal Arts), Lallie Scott (Liberal Arts), Jon Shapiro (Business & Technology), and John Yeutter (Business & Technology).
Council Officers in attendance: Gary Wickham (President),
Andrew
Vassar (Vice President), and Chuck Ziehr (Secretary-Treasurer).
B. Committees and Standing Reports
1. Minutes of September 3, 2004 meeting were corrected and approved.
2. Treasurer's Report
Since last month's report $40 have been spent (two monthly phone
charges).
This leave a current balance is $4,534.
3. Faculty Welfare Committee Report
Andrew Vassar, Council Vice President and chair of the committee is
serving on the Employee Appreciation Day Committee. He reported that
the
NSU Employee Appreciate Week will be moved to the spring of the year
with
the next one probably being in March 2006.
C. Old Business
1. Circle of Excellence
The permanent plaque was available for viewing (a permanent location
is still to be determined). The plaque bears the name, degree,
department,
year of award, and award category (teaching, research, or service) of
past
winners. The plaque features this inscription:
Special thanks are due Vickie Sheffler, University Archivist, for helping to research past awardees.Northeastern State University
The Council of the Faculty Association
Recognizes
The Best of an Excellent Faculty
Circle of Excellence Award Recipients
2. Award for Previous Faculty Presidents
No progress to report
3. Grievance Policy (Faculty Handbook Section 3.7) Committee
Report
Terri Baker presented a draft of a revised policy from the committee
(Baker, Lallie Scott, Chuck Ziehr, with assistance from Gary
Cheatham).
John Yeutter moved and Jon Shapiro seconded that the policy be
accepted.
Following discussion and revisions the policy (see below) was approved
unanimously.
Revised
by Faculty Council,
3.71
Introduction
To
aid in protecting faculty rights, a committee is established to
investigate
specific charges alleging the violation of faculty rights and to make
recommendations
to the administration regarding the disposition of these specific
cases.
The committee shall be a standing committee and shall conduct its
business
only during the eighteen (18) weeks of each of the two regular
semesters
(fall, spring) of the academic year.
3.72 Grievance Committee Membership
Grievance
Committee members shall be full-time teaching faculty. Faculty Council
representatives will not be eligible for membership. Grievance
Committee
members will be elected by secret ballot. Each academic unit, as
specified
in the Faculty Association By-Laws (See Appendix B), will elect two
members
to serve a term of office (two years) simultaneously with its Faculty
Council
representative. Elections for Faculty Council representatives and
Grievance
Committee members will be held at the times specified for the election
of Faculty Council representatives in the Association By-Laws.
Following
the election, the administrator of each academic unit will report the
results
of Grievance Committee elections to the Vice President for Academic
Affairs
and the President of the Faculty Association.
After
each fall semester has started, and the committee membership has been
filled,
the Faculty Association President will appoint a temporary chair from
the
committee membership. The temporary chair will call an organizational
meeting
of the committee by the end of the second week in September. At this
meeting,
the members of the committee shall elect a chair, vice chair, and
secretary
for the Grievance Committee for that academic year.
No
changes in sections 3.73, 3.74, 3.75.
3.76
Preliminary Hearing
The
formal complaint will be considered at a preliminary hearing, held on
the
main campus and attended by at least six (6) committee members, at
least
one from each academic unit, the Grievance Committee chair, the
aggrieved party, and involved administrators. At the time of the
announcement
for the hearing, the committee chair will provide lists of the
committee
membership to both the aggrieved faculty member and involved
administrators
and will invite written challenges about members having conflicts of
interest.
The chair will rule on such challenges. During the Preliminary Hearing,
the Director of Human Resources will serve as resource for the
Committee
to assure that procedures are understood and followed.
At
the preliminary hearing, an unbiased panel of at least three (3)
members
and not more than 12 members will be seated by lot from the quorum
present.The
quorum consists of seven (7) members, at least one from each academic
unit.
The panel will review the written grievance and the responses to the
grievance.
It will hear testimony and question those involved as desired, in order
to obtain a clear understanding of the issues. Only documents
previously
submitted and available to all parties, and/or requested by the panel
will
be considered. In the spirit of constructive interaction, all relevant
aspects of an issue will be discussed to insure that a misunderstanding
has not occurred. Prior to adjourning the meeting, the panel shall
decide
if the issue warrants a hearing. If so, the chair will advise the
aggrieved
party of the right of counsel to serve in an advisory capacity, and
will
set a later date for the formal hearing.
The
University’s General Counsel may provide advisement and consultation
upon
the request of the Director of Human Resources.
3.77
Formal Hearing
On
the day and time of the hearing, the aggrieved faculty member (and
advisory
counsel if chosen), involved administrators (with counsel if
appropriate),
witnesses and all other involved persons shall convene. The chair will
address possible conflict of interest issues involving committee
members.
Acting with input from both parties, a hearing panel of six (6)
members,
at least one from each academic unit, will be seated by the Chair,
plus
the Grievance Committee Chair.Faculty
seated as members of the hearing panel will be required to attend all
sessions
of the hearing. The committee chair will make every effort to schedule
sessions at times when the principal parties and panel have no classes.
No session of the hearing will be started without all members of the
seated
hearing panel being present. A repeated, unexcused failure of a seated
panel member to attend scheduled hearings, is cause for reprimand and
restarting
of the hearing. Regardless of membership on the hearing panel, all
members
of the Grievance Committee who have not been dismissed due to conflict
of interest should attend the hearings if at all possible. Once a
hearing
panel has been seated, the panel, committee chair, aggrieved party, and
the Vice President for Academic Affairs shall consult about having an
open
or closed hearing. The hearing panel then will decide whether or not
the
hearing should be open to the public.
The
Grievance Committee, sitting as the hearing panel, shall hear the case
in an orderly fashion. The chair of the Grievance Committee will read
the
charges as set forth in the formal written complaint. The panel will
systematically
review the specifics of the complaint and the responses to the charges.
The hearing panel may call and question those involved in the
complaint,
and question witnesses. The Grievance Committee chair, assisted by the
Director of Human Resources, shall maintain decorum and will ensure
that
the process proceeds in an orderly and responsible manner. Since
statements,
questions and answers will be recorded, and written evidence held,
libelous
and perjurious acts can be subject to further investigation.
In
making its decision, the hearing panel shall consider as evidence only
the formal written grievance and responses to the complaint, and
relevant
documents, including testimony, presented at the preliminary hearing,
and
to which all parties to the grievance have been afforded access. The
recommendations
of the hearing panel shall be decided by a majority vote. In the event
of a tied vote, the Grievance Committee chair will cast the deciding
vote. At
any point in the proceedings prior to the time when the hearing panel
retires
to consider its recommendations, the aggrieved party may, with the
consent
of the chair withdraw his/her grievance. A written report of
proceedings
up to the time of withdrawal will be made available to all parties.
4. Faculty Dining Room in the Cedar Room or some other
facility
Discussions continue with Lynn Howard about the use of the Cedar Room
for faculty dining. Although food will not be served, it is hoped
that at least drinks will be provided there.
5. Plagiarism -- draft statement
No progress to report
6. HEAC Function
No progress to report
7. Academic Administration Changes
There still appeared to be a lack of communication hindering the
transition
to the new academic administrative structure. For example, it was
noted that final degree check reports were not reaching the faculty
advisors
until well after the students get them. It is difficult to find
information
about the new administrative structure on the NSU website.
8. Faculty Association Constitution
A committee needs to be formed to review the constitution; this
committee
need not be made up of Council delegates. Terri Baker moved and
John
Yeutter seconded that the President of the Faculty Association be
empowered
to convene a committee to review and propose amendments to the
constitution
as seem appropriate. The motion passed unanimously.
9. NSU Homecoming
This year's homecoming celebration will be October 15-16 with the theme
"An American Tradition." President Wickham noted that faculty
volunteers
are needed to help with the various events.
10. Appellate Committee Election
The election will be held October 5, 2004 in the Administration
Building
Lobby on the Tahlequah campus from 8:00 a.m. until 3:00 p.m. and in the
Lobby between the Library and Administrative Offices on the
Broken
Arrow from 3:00 until 7:00 p.m. All tenured faculty may vote (114
full-time, tenured faculty and 4 tenured faculty who serve as
administrative
officers). The candidates are:
Dr. Anne DaveyThe four nominees receiving the highest number of votes will be elected to the committee with the next highest vote-getter named as junior alternate. The balloting will be supervised by one tenured Faculty Association member and one tenured AAUP member.
Mr. Gary Cheatham
Dr. William Edmondson
Dr. Mia Revels
Dr. Mike Rogers
Dr. Robert Taylor
11. Faculty Roster
President Wickham asked Council delegates to check for errors in the
listings for their academic units in the rosters that he sent to them.
D. New Business
1. Establishing Prospective Date and Time to Meet with President
Williams
and Vice President Pate
This item was combined with the next agenda item.
2. Establishing Format for Meeting with President Williams and
Vice President Pate
Lallie Scott moved and Terri Baker seconded that on or near November
5, 2004 (depending on their availability) President Williams and Vice
President
Pate be invited to meet with the Faculty Council, and that the format
would
be for faculty to submit questions to Gary Wickham by October 15.
President Wickham will have editorial control in synthesizing the
questions
to be presented in advance to President Williams and Vice President
Pate.
The motion was approved unanimously.
E. Other Business
There was no other business.
F. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 5:10 p.m.